Published
Author
As digitalisation and data-driven working methods reshape how organisations operate, the ability to lead change becomes increasingly critical. Yet change management is often treated as a temporary project support rather than a strategic capability. This article highlights why such an approach risks undermining benefit realisation and long-term effects – and why change management needs to be integrated into the heart of the organisation to meet the demands of a digital age.
In today’s rapidly changing organisational landscape, change has become a permanent condition rather than a distinct phase. Digitalisation, automation, and data-driven ways of working mean that organisations’ structures, roles, and processes must continuously be reconsidered. Despite this, change management in many organisations is still handled as a time-limited project phase that is only activated once a major decision about investment or the introduction of a new IT system has already been made. This reactive approach entails significant challenges.
Research shows that organisations' ability to realise the effects of investments – especially in complex IT systems – largely depends on people's behaviours, understanding and willingness to change. When change management is conducted as an "on-off function" within projects, there is a lack of both long-term responsibility and organisational learning. The functions given responsibility for the change are rarely provided with conditions to work preventively to identify obstacles, develop behaviours, and ensure that changes are entrenched over time. This leads to established patterns and working methods being restored after the project's conclusion, which reduces the possibility of realising expected effects.
When change management is conducted as an 'on‑and off function' in projects, there is neither long-term responsibility nor organisational learning – which means that established working methods often revert after the project ends.
Digitalisation intensifies these challenges. It changes not only tools and processes but also the logic of how organisations operate and how work is organised. Automation, AI-based decision support and distributed digital platforms mean that future organisations must develop a high readiness for change, where employees continuously adapt their behaviours, roles and competences. To succeed, a more holistic approach to change management is required – a strategic capability integrated into the organisation's structure, rather than being limited to projects.
Such a shift means that change management becomes a continuous part of business development. It involves, among other things, establishing systematic models for behavioural change, ensuring early analyses of impact when implementing new initiatives, and integrating change management already in the preliminary study and procurement phase of IT-related investments. When change management is conducted proactively, organisations can better adapt their structures to digital development and simultaneously strengthen their ability to realise long-term effects.
To get there, organisations need to view change management as a strategic and skills-driven function. This means creating mandates, resources and continuity – as well as developing a culture where change is not seen as a disruption but as a natural part of everyday work. In a digital age, change management thus becomes not a support function, but a crucial prerequisite for organisations seeking to ensure impact, realise value and strengthen their competitiveness in the long term.
In addition to the regulations, high demands are also placed on the robustness of the systems. the public and financial sectors handle large amounts of sensitive data and must guarantee both the availability of the system and its integrity. It is not only about protecting the systems from external threats but also ensuring that internal mistakes and technical faults do not lead to serious consequences.
For banks and insurance companies, a technical fault can have significant financial consequences and damage customer trust. Within the public sector, a system failure can affect citizens' access to important services, which can have far-reaching consequences for society.
It also places demands on the internal users, who often have extensive experience and are accustomed to working in the organisation's current system.
